a report on the iran-united states claims tribunal judgments (hague)
نویسندگان
چکیده
0
منابع مشابه
state responsibility for nationalization and expropriation:a preliminary survey of the awards of the iran-united states claims tribunal
the present article deals with the issues of nationalization and expropriation in the light of iran-united states claims tribunal awards by looking at their legality and the limits on the rights of states to nationalise and expropriate, while discussing some case law. i will argue that the state’s right to nationalize foreign property is an attribute of its sovereignty and derives from territor...
متن کاملcontroversial issues of compensation in cases of expropriation and nationalization: awards of the iran-united states claims tribunal
abstract the present article will discuss the issue of compensation in cases of expropriation and nationalization in the light of the iran-united states claims tribunal. it is a well recognized rule in international law that the property of alien cannot be taken without appropriate compensation. but, the standard of compensation for expropriated private property has been the subject of controv...
متن کاملOn Why the United States Should Not Attack Iran: A Conservative, Evangelical Christian Response
In the midst of American intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in the aftermath of the presidential election in Iran, support for American involvement in Iran has increased in some circles. In this piece, our desire is to give a conservative, evangelical Christian response to why America should not support any military action against Iran. A position advocated by many of us is “Just War.” I...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
مجله حقوقی بین المللیجلد ۱۵، شماره شماره ۲۱، صفحات ۲۵۱-۲۵۸
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023